Well, here we go again. The Alliance for a Competitive Economy of Greater Spokane Incorporated, A.K.A.: Greater Spokane Incorporated, (GSI), the same people who, a few years back, advocated, on their web site, that local businesses should engage in business with Red China, are trying to whip-up the panic-susceptible electorate into a frenzy over an imagined residential encroachment on the “end” of Fairchild Air Force Base’s runway. If, they say, this “encroachment” doesn’t end, the Base will be closed, thousands of people will leave the area, the local economy (and government) will collapse; In other words, Spokane will become a ghost town.
First: Which runway? Five or twenty-three? They don’t say. Is the “encroachment” the industrial area a couple miles off runway 5, to the north-east? Is it Medical Lake to the south? Espanola to the east? Airway Heights? I’ve not been able to find any maps on their web site. I suspect it’s because they don’t want people to actually understand what they are voting on and there’s an agenda at work.
Personally, I think they’ve fixed their attention on the area east and west between Craig Road and Hayford Road, north and south between Highway 2 and McFarlane Road. Somewhere in there, I think, is their evil “encroachment” which is all part of Airway Heights.
You’re reading this entry on a computer, I presume. So, open-up Google Earth and look at the area around FAFB. What are these fascists, (look the word up and compare it to the relational behavior between GSI and the City/County government), talking about?
There’s more going on here than meets the eye, I think. Personally, I think this is a MANUFACTURED crisis. GSI isn’t interested in constructing parks. GSI is about acquiring power and money for their members.
If there really is an “encroachment” somewhere out there, the solution is to zone the area industrial or not issue any residential building permits. If GSI was really concerned, they should encourage their real estate developer members to develop their residential areas elsewhere. There are a lot of solutions which do not increase taxes and add to the inventory of government-owned land.
GSI supported the whipping-up of opposition the the Indians and their casino on the other side of Highway 2 and now they are doing the same thing here. Since they advocated local businesses get together with the Red Chinese economically, I’ve lost all trust and respect for this organization. So, I have to ask: Why do they want this land? What is their agenda? Is their another behind-the-scenes “deal” going on between government and this business organization that nobody’s talking about? How does government acquisition of this land make money for GSI members? Follow the money/power trail. That’s where the answer is to be found. Don’t be a Lemming or a mind-numbed robot. Just because this is a local issue does not insulate it, or the people involved, from the effects of greed-driven corruption. Demand answers before you pull the lever (or fill-in the ellipse) for GSI’s Proposition 1, on election day, November 5th.